Legal Opinion
Halliburton Services v. Alexander
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 10, 1976No. 48072PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice:
The issue for review involves correctness of award of compensation for ac-cidential injury sustained from a fall in course of covered employment. More narrowly defined the question is whether injury from idiopathic fall induced by an employee’s physical condition arose out of course of employment.
Respondent, hereafter claimant, was employed as a security guard by Halliburton Services, herein referred to as respondent. Back injury during army service was basis for compensation (20%) service connected disability. Claimant also suffered from, and had been treated for,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Choctaw County v. BatemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- National Biscuit Co. v. LoutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Oklahoma Leader Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. EavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bittman v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Turner v. B Sew InnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Pauls Valley Travel Center v. BoucherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- MULLENDORE v. MERCY HOSPITAL ARDMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Flanner v. Tulsa Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.