Legal Opinion

Flanner v. Tulsa Public Schools

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 2002No. 95,223PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, J.,

T1 The issue presented by this review proceeding is whether an employee may recover worker's compensation benefits for burn injuries sustained at work when she fell against a large coffee pot while suffering an epileptic seizure. The trial judge found the injury was not compensable and the. Court of Civil Appeals sustained the order, and we have previously granted certiorari. We find that the employee is entitled to worker's compensation benefits. We vacate the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, and remand the matter to the trial court.

T2 Inetta Flanner was employed by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Bittman v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Corbett v. Express PersonnelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Pauls Valley Travel Center v. BoucherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. Belcher v. T.D. Williamson, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Byrd v. Volunteers of AmericaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Flanner v. Tulsa Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API