Legal Opinion

State v. Monk

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 1983No. 824SC691PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant brings forth 17 assignments of error on appeal which concern (1) his competency to stand trial, (2) the admission of his in-custody statements, (3) the court’s failure to order a bifurcated trial, (4) the court’s evidentiary rulings and (5) the sentence imposed on him.

I

The first two assignments of error we address are those involving defendant’s competency to stand trial.

The court’s order of 9 October 1981 recommitting defendant to Dorothea Dix provided, among other things, that:

4. The treating physician in his or her discretion shall administer such medication at…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. ChatmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. DevineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. EasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API