Skanks v. Union Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
This was a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act. The compensation commissioner made an award in favor of the claimant, and on appeal the district court’ made a similar award. The respondent appeals to this court.
The only contentions presented are that under the evidence and *585under the facts as found by the trial court, the claimant at the time of his injury was engaged in work in furtherance of interstate commerce within the purview of the federal employers’ liability act, that the rights of the parties are not governed by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Piggue v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Krouse v. LowdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Blessman v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
3Cited by8 opinions
- Agostino v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1943
- Holl v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1947
- Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson v. FisherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Harris v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Patsaw v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.