Legal Opinion
A. S. Rampell, Inc. v. Hyster Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
This is an action for damages arising out of alleged tortious acts committed by defendants leading up to and culminating in the termination of plaintiff’s dealer-distributor agreement with defendant Hyster Company. The individual defend *790ants are Hyster Company’s district manager (Shaffer) and one of plaintiff’s salesmen (Chester). Defendants have moved to dismiss for insufficiency each of the six causes of action in the amended complaint.
Plaintiff alleges that it (and its predecessor companies) had been for fifteen years a distributor of Hyster Company products for territory in New York and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Bushwick-Decatur Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilson v. McClennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Architectural Manufacturing Co. v. Airotec, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse Wkrs. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
- Wendell v. SleppinNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- A. S. Rampell, Inc. v. Hyster Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956