Legal Opinion

Cities Service Oil Co. v. Kuckuck

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The lease involved in this action was executed on July 14, 1931. On that day defendants were the owners of certain lots in the city of Tomah, Wisconsin. The plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the production, refining, and marketing of petroleum products. As a part of this business, it conducts filling stations for the retail sale of its products. By the terms of the lease, which was entered into before any service station or equipment had been erected on the premises, defendants leased to plaintiff the premises involved. The rent was set at $1 per year. The term of the lease was five years…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Express Co. v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Watford Oil & Gas Co. v. ShipmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Orange Crush Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Tanner Motor Tours of Nevada, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Clinton Service Co. v. ThorntonMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Cobb v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. York v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Spankus v. WestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API