York v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The Industrial Commission denied compensation on the ground that the relation of employer and employee did not exist. The employee brought action to' review the order denying compensation. The circuit court held that under the undisputed facts the plaintiff was an employee of the defendant Schlimgen Memorials, Inc., and vacated the order and returned the record to the commission with directions to determine whether the employee suffered compensable injury, and to award compensation if it found that he did.
The appellants contend that upon the facts as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Morehead v. New York Ex Rel. TipaldoSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Union Dime Savings Institution v. WilmotNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Kolman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Kneeland-McLurg Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. BrowerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Farm Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.