Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 26, 1989No. 491A88Published

1DissentJustice Meyer

I wish to express at the outset of this dissenting opinion my view that the alleged conduct of the employer in this case cannot be condoned and that if the allegations of the complaint can be proved, the employee should have a remedy and a recovery for his losses and damages in the federal courts. If, in addition to his federal remedy, a state remedy should be provided, it should be provided by our General Assembly and not by judicial legislation of this Court.

Plaintiff has not attempted to pursue any remedies which might be available to him under the federal Surface Transportation Assistance…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Sides v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API