Legal Opinion

State v. Hewitt

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1984No. 19419PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Defendants appeal their conviction of distribution of a controlled substance (10 pounds of marijuana) pursuant to U.C.A., 1953, § 58-37-8(l)(a)(ii) (Supp.1983). Defendants argue that (1) the prosecution used or failed to correct false or perjured testimony in violation of their due process rights; (2) the trial court erred in refusing to dismiss two veniremen for cause; and (3) the trial court erred in refusing to give defendants’ requested jury instructions defining “distribution for value.”

On February 17, 1982, Detective Kelly Call, a member of the Northern Region Drug…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Crawford v. ManningUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. CallihamUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Randle v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. GotschallUtah Supreme Court · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API