Legal Opinion
State v. Calliham
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 2002No. 20000169PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Chief Justice:
1 1 Two brothers, Jordan and Terril Calli-ham (collectively, "the Calliham brothers"), were convicted of murder for the killing of their friend and classmate James Eaton ("Eaton"). Terril Calliham ("Terrill") appeals, 1 claiming that the trial court erred in denying his request for a psychological evaluation of the State's primary witness and in refusing to sever his trial from that of his brother. In addition, Terril claims that the trial court erred in denying his motions for a mistrial, that the trial court improperly removed two potential jurors for cause, that the…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. JeffsUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. LarrabeeUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Baird v. BairdUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. KozlovCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.