Legal Opinion

Mountjoy v. Warden, New Hampshire State Prison

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 3, 2001No. 00-1735PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Habeas corpus petitioner Keith Mountjoy argues that his convictions for sexual assault and burglary must be set aside because the New Hampshire judge who presided over his trial did not advise him about his defense counsel’s possible conflict of interest and make an appropriate inquiry on the record, thereby violating his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Federal review of habeas petitions is governed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) (Supp. II 1996). Under the standards of AEDPA, the district court denied Mountjoy’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ouber v. GuarinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Campiti v. MatesanzDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  3. United States v. GorskiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  4. State v. DhaliwalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. DhaliwalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API