Legal Opinion
Vermont Mutual Insurance v. Zamsky
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 9, 2013No. 13-1172PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
It seems self-evident that a story that involves throwing gasoline on a smoldering fire is unlikely to have a happy ending. That is true here, but the parties to this appeal have sifted through the embers and identified what some might regard as an oxymoron: an interesting insurance coverage question. After careful consideration, we conclude that the district court properly construed the relevant insurance contracts and proceeded to answer the coverage question correctly. 1 Accordingly, we affirm.
Defendant-appellee Andrew Zamsky is an insured under three homeowners’…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Haley v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Daniel J. Roche Et Ux. Valerie Roche v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Hazen Paper Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Cody v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Hakim v. Massachusetts Insurers' Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Clark School for Creative Learning, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. OtuonyeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Viscito v. National Planning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Sterngold Dental, LLC v. HDI Global Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Torres-Ronda v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.