Daniel J. Roche Et Ux. Valerie Roche v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires us to consider whether a private party should be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for an arrest and unsuccessful prosecution that followed on the heels of its detailed report of suspected wrongdoing to the authorities. The district court found no competent evidence that the defendant violated § 1983, discerned no merit in the plaintiffs’ other claims, and granted brevis disposition. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Descrying no error, we affirm.
I
Background
We limn the facts in the light most hospitable to the summary judgment loser, consistent with record…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by347 opinions
- 71 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1398, 35 fed.r.serv.3d 395 Miguel Angel Ayala-Gerena v. Bristol Myers-Squibb Company, D/B/A Bristol Myers-SquibbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Freeman v. Town of HudsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Nieves v. McSweeneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Augustus John Camelio v. American Federation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Kate Frazier v. Fairhaven School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
342 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.