Legal Opinion
Ferndale Corp. v. Schulman Urban Development Associates
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 1, 1990No. 90 Civ. 1483 (GLG), 90 Civ. 3248 (GLG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge:
I. FACTS
Schulman Urban Development Associates, whose successor in interest is Schul-man Master Limited Partnership I, 1 entered into a commercial lease agreement with Ferndale Corporation (“Ferndale”) on March 31, 1984. This contract provided that Ferndale would lease a portion of the third floor of a commercial building located at 170 Hamilton Avenue, White Plains, New York, for approximately a ten-year term. The lease’s payment provisions provided for a set monthly rent, plus a percentage of certain enumerated costs of operating the premises. The lease stated…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Laventhol & HorwathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Moeller v. ZaccariaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Jordan v. BermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992