Legal Opinion

Rath Packing Co. v. Becker

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1975No. Nos. 73-2481, 73-2482, 73-3092, 73-2496 and 73-3180PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICH, Judge:

These suits were brought by Rath Packing Company (hereinafter “Rath”) to enjoin the enforcement of certain California statutes and regulations pertaining to the labeling by weight of packaged foods at retail, and for a declaration that the federal Wholesome Meat Act of 1967, 21 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., and a regulation promulgated thereunder, 9 CFR 317.2(h)(2), preempt these California statutes and regulations. They were consolidated for decision in the district court and on appeal.

Rath is a nation-wide processor and seller of meat products, including bacon, and maintains a…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Takeda v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Kennecott Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated v. Helen Echo HayduCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API