Legal Opinion

State v. Oxentine

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1967No. 340PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pléss, J.

The defendant’s objection to the excusal of jurors by the clerk of superior court was not well founded. The .motion itself says that-the .persons excused were those who made application for exemption and who were entitled to claim such exemption under G.S. 9-19, 90-45, 90-150, and 127-84, and that 'those excused from service was' “pursuant to the North Carolina General Statutes.’.’ His claim that the statutes referred to above are unconstitutional is without merit. State v. Knight, 269 N.C. 100, 152 S.E. 2d 179.

No other, reason .is- presented for quashing the bill of indictment.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Rodney P.(Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. State v. PruittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. MidgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Pueblo v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
  5. People v. Rodney P.(Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API