Legal Opinion

State v. Midgett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 24, 1970No. 702SC54PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

It is settled law in North Carolina that the imposition in a given case of a greater sentence in the Superior Court Division upon trial de novo than was imposed in the District Court Division is constitutionally permissible. State v. Spencer, 7 N.C. App. 282, 172 S.E. 2d 280 (1970), (Affirmed, North Carolina Supreme Court, 13 May 1970). This assignment of error has no merit.

The motion to quash the supplemental jury venire is directed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and in the absence of evidence of abuse of discretion will not be disturbed on appeal. State v. Oxentine, 270 N.C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. . DonnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. OxentineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Matter of EllerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. In re M.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Matter of GrubbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. In re S.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API