Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1985No. 3569-3-PCPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

Ronald Paul Bishop filed this petition for review of denial of post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 32.9(c), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17A A.R.S. 1 We accepted review solely to address Bishop’s claim that he was denied his right to a unanimous jury verdict. 2

The facts necessary for the disposition of this issue are as follows. 3 In May 1976, a jury convicted Bishop of first degree murder for the slaying of Norman Troxell. The instruction to the jury for first degree murder included a premeditation and felony-murder charge. The felony-murder instruction was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. EncinasArizona Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Garza RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HerreraArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. Herrera, Jr.Arizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Schad v. SchriroDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2006
  5. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API