Schad v. Schriro
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SILVER, District Judge.
Petitioner Edward Harold Schad filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus alleging that he is imprisoned and sentenced to death in violation of the United States Constitution. (Dkt.l). 2 The Amended Petition raised twenty-eight claims, including numerous subclaims. (Dkt.27). In an Order dated May 8, 2000, the Court found that Claims C, D, E, F, G, I (in part), K, N (in part), P (in part), T, U (in part), X, Z, AA (in part), and BB were procedurally barred, and that Claims S, Y, W, and Y were meritless. (Dkt.59.) The Court found that…
2Cases cited170 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schad v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Schad v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Ryan v. SchadSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Giles v. Wyeth, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- Schad v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.