Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Baldwin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1980No. 2890 and 2891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUGERMAN, Judge:

Appellees were arrested following a search of their apartment with a warrant, and charged with possession of marijuana with intent to deliver, a violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act. 1 Pre-trial suppression motions were denied and Appellees, tried jointly, were convicted by a jury.

Post trial motions were filed by both Appellees, setting forth eight asserted errors as the bases for relief. Following argument, the trial judge, sitting as a court en banc, on January 11, 1977, granted Appellees’ motions for new trials, and by the same order,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BeaufordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. HassineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. United States v. GellerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. HammondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. JungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API