Legal Opinion

United States v. Geller

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 1983No. Crim. 82-224PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

Defendants 1 , moving to suppress intercepted wire communications, argue that Pennsylvania’s “Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act” of 1978, 18 Pa.Con.Stat.Ann. § 5701 et seq., (“Wiretap Act” or “Act”), violates both the federal and state constitutions, that governmental misconduct in acquiring the order authorizing wire interception irredeemably tainted and distorted any permissible interception and that the government agents who executed the order violated legislative and judicial commands. A brief factual background is helpful in…

2Cases cited98 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlystoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. United States v. TartaglioneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. United States v. Salvatore A. Williams, A/K/A "Sonny." United States of America v. Salvatore C. Williams, A/K/A "Sal." United States of America v. Adolph Williams, A/K/A "Junior."Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. HassineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API