Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Prince
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided June 17, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph A. Cox, S.
The decree admitting this testator’s will to probate restrained the executor from paying or satisfying any *220legacy or distributive share until further order of the Surrogate. The executor now moves to have such restriction removed.
The facts essential to a decision are not in dispute. At the time of his death on January 2,1964, the testator was an American citizen domiciled in Switzerland. His will, which was executed in New York on November 6, 1961, attempted to exercise a power of appointment granted to this testator by the will of his mother and bequeathed his entire…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kolovrat v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Clark v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Matter of New York Life Insurance and Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Bishop v. BishopNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate RenardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979
- In re the Estate of RenardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1981
- In re the Estate of VischerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
- Matter of Estate of WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994