Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Renard
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided March 16, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Millard L. Midonick, J.
This proceeding raises the choice of law issue which was not before the court in its prior decision herein. (Matter of Renard, 100 Misc 2d 347, affd 71 AD2d 554, mot for lv to app den 48 NY2d 609.) The decree admitting the will to probate restrained the executors from distributing the assets until the further order of this court. The purpose of this restraint was to permit the determination of the claim asserted by decedent’s son to the forced share interest he would be awarded by French law against the provisions of his mother’s will.
The petitioning…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of RenardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Estate of Meyer v. HeymannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Neto v. ThornerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- In re the Trusts Created by ChappellNew York Surrogate's Court · 2009
- In the Matter of the Estate of: Paul Arthur BentleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2024