Legal Opinion

Cogswell v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 3, 1985No. 83-05552; CA A31557PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Worker’s Compensation Board affirming the referee’s dismissal of her claim because she failed to establish good cause for not requesting a hearing within 60 days of the date she was notified that the claim had been denied. ORS 656.319(1). 1 We affirm.

In 1982 claimant was employed at Agripac, Inc., on the production belt. The work required repetitive movements of the arms and shoulders. On October 15, she began experiencing symptoms in her neck and shoulders and, after consulting with a physician, Dr. Buell, she filed a claim alleging a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wamsher v. Brooks Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Publishers Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Naught v. Gamble, Inc./Pepsi Cola, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. DeCouteau v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Angel MedFlight Worldwide Air Ambulance Serv. v. SAIF Corp. (In re Keely)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Guerra v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API