Anderson v. Publishers Paper Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order dismissing his claim. On remand from this court, the Board ruled that he had not established good cause for failing to request a hearing within 60 days after the denial of his claim.1 We affirm.
The background facts are in Anderson v. Publishers Paper Co., 78 Or App 513, 515, 717 P2d 635, rev den 301 Or 666 (1986), and we will not repeat them here. We remanded for the Board to determine whether claimant’s failure to request a hearing on the denial in a timely manner was due to his “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Anderson v. Publishers Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Cogswell v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Naught v. Gamble, Inc./Pepsi Cola, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ogden Aviation v. LayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Hempel v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- SAIF Corp. v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991