Legal Opinion

United States v. Gottlieb

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1998No. 96-3278PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant Avram Gottlieb pleaded guilty to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Prior to Gottlieb’s plea, the government filed an information seeking enhancement of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c), popularly known as the “Three Strikes” statute. Congress enacted the Three Strikes statute in 1994 as part of a comprehensive crime control bill. See Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Pub.L. No. 103-322, § 70001, 108 Stat. 1796, 1982 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c)). The statute requires the district court to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Sorenson v. Secretary of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,709 United States of America v. Christopher Arutunoff, United States of America v. Steven J. Devries, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Carole Diaz, AKA Carole M. Cefaratti, Carole Cefaratti-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. John Vincent MacKovichCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. GardnerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1998
  5. United States v. GilgertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API