Legal Opinion
United States v. Gardner
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided July 7, 1998No. 4:97-cv-00034PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOLMES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a motion for attorneys’ fees (Docket # 73) by Defendant Richard Clark Gardner. In this ease of first impression, Mr. Gardner requests that the Court assess attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in his defense pursuant to Public Law No. 105-119, § 617, 111 Stat. 2440, 2519 (1997) (the “Hyde Amendment”) (enacted Nov. 26, 1997). Mr. Gardner seeks $108,332.91 in fees and expenses. A hearing was held in this matter on June 11,1998.
I
Agents of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) began investigating Mr. Gardner in 1991 in connection…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States of America v. James Truesdale Ronald HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee v. Ranger Electronic Communications, Inc., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Jeffrey SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.