Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Blood

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1932No. 4694PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Gillespie, brought this action against the defendant to recover two real estate bonds of the Detweiler Corporation, or their value in money, which he had exchanged for fifteen shares of stock of the Guaranteed Securities Company. The complaint contains two causes of action.

In the first cause it is set forth, in substance, that on the 21st day of February, 1924, at Los Angeles, state of California, the defendant company, a Utah corporation, through its agent, J. J. Morey, sold to the plaintiff fifteen shares of its capital stock of the par value of $100…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Fell v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. MacDonald v. Reich & Lievre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. United States Bond & Finance Corp. v. National Building & Loan Ass'n of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  2. Uinta Pipeline Corp. v. White Superior Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Borghetti v. System & Computer Tech, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Shepard v. City Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
  5. Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API