The Fort Fetterman, Libellee, and Chas. Kurz & Co., Inc., Cross-Libellant v. South Carolina State Highway Department, Libellant And
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
Subsequent to our opinion in this case 1 we granted the appellee a rehearing and, at the same time, denied a similar request as filed by appellant. We had previously concluded that, under the situation pre sented, the damages should be divided. On rehearing we adhere to our previously expressed view that the improper navigation of the appellant vessel contributed to the resulting damage, but we find it necessary to remand the case to the district court for further proceedings, without directions to divide the damages, to the end that specific findings may be made in light of the Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. Norfolk-Berkley Bridge CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1928
- Monroe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
3Cited by15 opinions
- Garner v. Cities Service Tankers Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. DrinkwaterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1977
- Atlantic Pipe Line Company v. Dredge PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Complaint of WassonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- The Tank Steamer Fort Fetterman, Libellee, and Chas. Kurz & Co., Inc., Cross-Libellant v. South Carolina State Highway Department, Libellant AndCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.