The Tank Steamer Fort Fetterman, Libellee, and Chas. Kurz & Co., Inc., Cross-Libellant v. South Carolina State Highway Department, Libellant And
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, District Judge.
We have considered the merits of this controversy on two prior occasions. 1 Upon rehearing following our first opinion, we adhered to the applicability of the Pennsylvania rule, but remanded the case to the District Court for specific findings.
Essentially there are two questions for determination. One involves the alleged protrusion of the gear racks and whether this constituted a statutory fault; the other concerns the admitted violation of the permit issued by the War Department prior to the construction of the Ashley River bridge with regard to the maximum elevation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. ZuccaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Baltimore & Ohio Railway Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fort Fetterman v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The Dow Chemical Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- In Re Silver Bridge Disaster LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1974
- United States v. Sabine Towing & Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
- Bedeian v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- Chicago And Western Indiana Railroad Company v. Motorship Buko MaruCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.