Legal Opinion
Mannikko v. Harrah's Reno, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 27, 1986No. CV-R-83-359-ECRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.
Nancy Mannikko (Plaintiff) seeks damages from defendant Harrah’s Reno, Inc. (Harrah’s) for alleged retaliatory discharge because Plaintiff filed a sex discrimination complaint with the Nevada Equal Rights Commission (NERC) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Plaintiff also seeks damages for claimed breach of an implied contract of employment.
It should be noted at the outset that this is not a sex discrimination case. This is not a race discrimination case. The issues raised by Plaintiff are whether she was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cohen v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Hansen v. Harrah'sNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Wrighten v. Metropolitan Hospitals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Muriel E. Kauffman v. Sidereal Corporation, an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Evelyn JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William P. CLARK, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Cordova v. Harrah's Reno Hotel-CasinoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1988
- Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987