Legal Opinion

In Re Kettles

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1936No. 23649. Respondent disbarredPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

This proceeding against the respondent, Arthur W. Kettles, was begun pursuant to the order of this court dated April 21, 1933. The commissioners have filed a report and have moved that the respondent be disbarred and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys. The respondent has filed exceptions to the report, and has also filed a motion to suppress the depositions of the complaining witnesses, George T. and Mary H. Goodridge. This motion has been taken with the case.

On October 9, 1934, the Goodridges filed a complaint with the committee on grievances of the Chicago Bar Association.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re NeedhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. FoulksIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Staunton Coal Co. v. MenkIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Temby v. William Brunt Pottery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bireline v. EspenscheidAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. In Re PatlakIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  4. French v. FrenchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  5. Jacobs v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API