Legal Opinion

In Re Patlak

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1938No. 22299. Respondent disbarredPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This disbarment proceeding originally came to this court on a report of the commissioners of this court dated December 18, 1933, made on testimony heard on complaints by some twenty different complainants. In the interim respondent was tried and convicted in the criminal court of Cook county on an indictment charging larceny. This court reversed the conviction in People v. Patlak, 363 Ill. 40, and, on motion of respondent, the cause was re-referred to the commissioners on April 21, 1936, and by that order this court directed the commissioners to permit respondent to offer evidence in his own…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. GoodmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Svalina v. SaravanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. The People v. PatlakIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Kennedy's DisbarmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. In Re KettlesIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re DriscollIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re BrowningIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In re KeoghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. In Re BourgeoisIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. TheardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API