Legal Opinion

Bireline v. Espenscheid

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1973No. 73-22PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE DIXON

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiffs, Esther Bireline and her husband Robert S. Bireline brought this action pursuant to the Dram Shop Act. After a jury trial the Circuit Court of Tazewell County entered judgment on the verdicts in favor of each plaintiff. Defendants appeal from those judgments.

On June 28, 1969 plaintiffs were returning from Peoria to their home in Washington, Illinois, proceeding easterly on the south lane of the state highway when an automobile driven by Charles McGonagle in a westerly direction crossed over the center line onto the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore v. Jewel Tea Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Moore v. Jewel Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  3. Geisberger v. QuincyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. Grant v. PaluchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Edenburn v. RigginsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Arthur v. CatourIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Biehler v. White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Muranyi v. Turn Verein Frisch-AufAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Brumley v. Federal Barge Lines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Beaird v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API