Legal Opinion

State v. Oages

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided June 2, 2005No. 11-04-00183-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRY McCALL, Justice.

Teaundra Lasha Oages, appellee, was charged by information with possession of less than two ounces of marihuana. The trial court granted appellee’s motion to suppress evidence. Because we hold that, under Article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution, the officer made a valid search of appellee’s vehicle incident to her arrest, we reverse and remand.

Background Facts

The facts are not disputed. Officer Mike Baird of the Abilene Police Department stopped appellee for a traffic violation. Appellee ■ told Officer Baird that there was an outstanding warrant for her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. OagesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Dew v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
  3. State v. Oages, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
  4. Kevin W. Dew v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
  5. State of Texas v. Oages, Teaundra LashaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API