State v. Oages
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
TERRY McCALL, Justice.
This court originally reversed the trial court’s order granting Teaundra Lasha Oages’s motion to suppress. State v. Oag-es, 162 S.W.3d 445 (TexApp.-Eastland 2005). The Court of Criminal Appeals held that, when the losing party requests findings of fact and conclusions of law after a ruling on a motion to suppress, the trial court must enter such findings and conclusions; vacated our judgment; and remanded the cause to this court for further proceedings. State v. Oages, 210 S.W.3d 643 (Tex.Crim.App.2006). The trial court has now entered findings of fact…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hankston, Gareic JerardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
- Bobby Joe Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2008
- Mark Jason Normand v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2025
- Michael Lynn Johnson v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.