State v. . Hinson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Indictment for Forcible Trespass, tried at Spring Term, 1880, of Mecklenburg Superior Court, before McKoy, J. The case had been tried in the inferior court of .Mecklen-burg, and upon the conviction of the defendant he appealed to the superior court. Upon examination of the record and after argument, the judge held that there was no error and affirmed the judgment below, and the defendant appealed to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtAsni, J.
The facts of the case are, that on the first of October, 1880, one Elizabeth Plolbrooks, wife of W. J. Hol-brooks, in the absence of her husband, was sitting in the door of her house, when the defendant rode up and she forbade him from coming into the yard, but he rode into it and hallowed and asked where was Holbrooks. She told him she guessed he knew where he was, and for him to’ leave.' The defendant said, “ yes, d — n him, I have sent him to jail, and I intend to send him to the penitentiary,' and that he had come by to give her a d — n cursing, and did curse her, and remained until she…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- State v. . Brantly and WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Kirby v. Jules Chain Stores Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Saunders v. GilbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Freeman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.