Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Jules Chain Stores Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1936PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the ease: At the outstart of the argument in this Court, the defendants interposed a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This must be overruled. The case is controlled by the principles announced in Freeman v. Acceptance Corporation, 205 N. C., 257, 171 N. C., 63; Beasley v. Byrum, 163 N. C., 3, 79 S. E., 270; May v. Tel. Co., 157 N. C., 416, 72 S. E., 1057; Arthur v. Henry, ibid., 438, 73 S. E., 211; Kimberly v. Howland, 143 N. C., 398, 55 S. E., 778; Watkins v. Mfg. Co., 131 N. C., 536,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Purcell v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HayterTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Engle v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Watson v. DiltsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Harris v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. George v. Jordan Marsh CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Clark v. Associated Retail Credit Men of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API