Kirby v. Jules Chain Stores Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.,
after stating the ease: At the outstart of the argument in this Court, the defendants interposed a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This must be overruled. The case is controlled by the principles announced in Freeman v. Acceptance Corporation, 205 N. C., 257, 171 N. C., 63; Beasley v. Byrum, 163 N. C., 3, 79 S. E., 270; May v. Tel. Co., 157 N. C., 416, 72 S. E., 1057; Arthur v. Henry, ibid., 438, 73 S. E., 211; Kimberly v. Howland, 143 N. C., 398, 55 S. E., 778; Watkins v. Mfg. Co., 131 N. C., 536,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Purcell v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HayterTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Engle v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Watson v. DiltsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Harris v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- George v. Jordan Marsh CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Clark v. Associated Retail Credit Men of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.