Rummel v. Musgrave
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sutton
The parties are here in the same order as they appeared in the trial court and we will refer to them herein as plaintiffs and defendants.
*251Plaintiffs filed their action in the trial court to recover the payment of taxes paid under protest to the County Treasurer of Montrose County, Colorado. They are lessees of producing uranium lands under a lease from the United «States of America entered into under the terms of the Atomic Energy Act of 1946.
As error they urge the finding of the trial court that the statute in question properly levies a tax upon them as lessees of such real property and upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- City of Detroit v. Murray Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Township of MuskegonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Allardice v. Adams CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- City & County of Denver v. Security Life & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Cantina Grill, JV v. City & County of Denver County Board of Equalization Ex Rel. KennedySupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- Cantina Grill, JV v. City & County of Denver County Board of Equalization Ex Rel. KennedySupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.