Cantina Grill, JV v. City & County of Denver County Board of Equalization Ex Rel. Kennedy
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marquez
I 1 We granted certiorari review to consider whether several food and beverage concessionaires at a city-owned airport hold taxable possessory interests under our three-prong test established in Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc., 19 P.3d 1263 (Colo.2001). In Vail Associates, we held that a private possessory interest in tax-exempt *874government property 1 is taxable if it exhibits significant incidents of private ownership that distinguish it from the government's underlying tax-exempt ownership. Id. at 1279. We articulated three factors demonstrating such incidents of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- E-470 Public Highway Authority v. 455 Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Arapahoe County Board of Equalization v. PodollSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Board of Assessment Appeals v. SampsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hinsdale County Board of Equalization v. HDH PartnershipSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Lodge Properties, Inc. and Board of Assessment Appeals v. Eagle County Board of Equalization.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2022
- TABOR Foundation v. Regional Transportation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- HDH Partnership v. Hinsdale County Board of EqualizationColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Properties v. Eagle County Board of EqualizationColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.