Legal Opinion

Stadle v. Township of Battle Creek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1956No. Docket 66, Calendar 46,676PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelly, J.

The question presented in this appeal is: Should PA 1943, No 184, as amended, * be construed to allow a majority vote of township electors by referendum to nullify a township board’s amendment to a zoning ordinance?

The legislative intent, as expressed in sections 12 and 14 of said act, provides the answer to this question. Section 12 reads:

“Within 30 days following the passage of such zoning ordinance, a petition signed by a number of qualified and registered voters residing in the township equal to not less than 8 per cent of the total vote cast for all candidates for governor, at the last…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Johnson v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hammons v. FranzblauMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. Commissioner of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Jones v. Grand Ledge Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Heath Township v. SallMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Meridian Development Co. v. Edison Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  5. Elliott v. City of ClawsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API