Lockwood v. Commissioner of Revenue
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentCarr, J.
The legislature of the State at its current session undertook to increase revenues deemed necessary to defray governmental expenses. To accomplish that end PA 1959, No 263, was enacted as an amendment to the use tax act of 1937.* Said amendment followed in terminology the language of the statute as originally adopted. By section 3 thereof provision was made for an increase of the use tax to 4%, subject to the further. provision that if the property used, stored or consumed, had been acquired in a transaction on which the 3% sales tax† had been paid then the use tax should be 1% of the price…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Studier v. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.