State v. Baker
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice.
Defendant lawyer was charged with violating section 713.6, The Code 1977 1 (“Fraudulent conveyances”). He was convicted following trial to the court and now appeals. We affirm.
The facts developed upon this trial were similar to those submitted in defendant’s disciplinary proceeding. See Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct v. Baker, 269 N.W.2d 463 (Iowa 1978).
Defendant and W. W. Sindlinger were lawyers who formed a professional corporation which in turn was a partner in a Waterloo law firm. They, together with Wayne Mark, a realtor, owned Vi-Vim, Inc., a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. WaterburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. SharkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. ManicciaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.