Legal Opinion
Keller v. Hicks
California Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from the Tenth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.
This is an action to recover the amount of certain county warrants or orders drawn by the County Auditor upon the County Treasurer of Yuba County in favor of W. F. Hicks & Co. The complaint avers that the defendants, Hicks, Magruder, Addington, and Mrs. Laird (now Mrs. Carr), were partners, under the name of W. F. Hicks & Co., and as such printed the delinquent tax list of Yuba County for the year 1858; that two warrants, or orders, were issued to them therefor, the following being a copy of one of them:
“ Marysville, December 24th, 1858.
“ Warrant Wo. 712.—To the Treasurer of Yuba County : Pay…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Young v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
- Markle v. HatfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1807
- Kreutz v. LivingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Dana & Brother v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Keller v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Morrison v. Austin State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Hart v. Village of WyndmereNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Shakespear v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- George E. Hart, Inc. v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.