Legal Opinion
Shakespear v. Smith
California Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1888No. 11541PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.
This is an action by plaintiff as a taxpayer and resident of St. Helena school district No. 10, county of Napa, on his own behalf, and in behalf of all other tax-payers of said school district, for the surrender and cancellation, and to declare null and void, a certain order of W. A. C. Smith and 0. N. Hale, two of the trustees of said school district, on the county superintendent of schools, in favor of George B. Kennedy or order, which said order, with the assignments and indorsements thereon, is in the words and figures following:—
*639“order upon the county superintendent oe public
SCHOOLS.
“No.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Andrews v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People ex rel. Raun & Plant v. Bd. of Supervisors of El Dorado Cty.California Supreme Court · 1858
- Dana & Brother v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Keller v. HicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Meeker v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by10 opinions
- Honaker v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Curtin v. Salmon River Hydraulic Gold Mining & Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Bowles v. Neely, MayorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- California Raisin Growers' Ass'n v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- School District No. 9 v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.