Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Tennessee

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1970No. Crim. 16623PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AISO, J.

The People appeal from an order setting aside an information under section 995 of the Penal Code. (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. 1.) Defendant was charged by information in count I with illegal possession of seconal, a restricted dangerous drug (Health & Saf. Code, § 11910), and in count II with driving upon a highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and a drug (Veh. Code, § 23102, subd. (a)).

It appears that the trial court set aside the information upon the theory that the arrest, which occurred in the City of Pasadena, could not have been effected legally by deputy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ross v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Roth v. KeeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Piercy v. De FillipesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Relaxacizor, Inc. v. W. B. Geissinger & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. BullwinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1985
  4. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. BundesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API