Legal Opinion
Rosette Incorporated v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1998No. 96-2126PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants (collectively referred to as “Rosette”) appeal the district court’s dismissal, on statute of limitations grounds, of their claim alleging ownership of geothermal resources. The court’s determination of subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law, which we review de novo. Williams v. United States, 957 F.2d 742, 743 (10th Cir. 1992). Because the Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, controls Rosette’s lawsuit, and because Rosette did not file suit within the Act’s statute of limitations, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Rosette owns the surface estate to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Luckenbach Steamship Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- 118 East 60th Owners, Inc. v. Bonner Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Nevada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter v. Eugene Narvaez, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- SAC and Fox Nation v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- City Of Saint Paul, Alaska v. Donald EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.