Hill v. Huffines Hotel Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The trial judge found the facts to be that the defendant had been duly served with summons and had not shown excusable neglect or a meritorious defense, and that the damages awarded were not excessive. He set aside the verdict, not as a matter of discretion, but for the assigned reason that the trial had not been conducted in accordance with the regular and orderly practice of the court. He held that the only course open to the plaintiff was to obtain a judgment by default and inquiry and to prosecute the inquiry at a succeeding term of the court; and the sole question to be decided is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roberts v. . AllmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Glisson v. . GlissonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Gough v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Osborn v. . LeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Rawls v. . HenriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Caldwell v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Dehoff v. . BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Rich v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.