Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1951No. 17524PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts). The controlling question here is whether the grantor in the bond for title had the right to rescind the contract and resell the property when the notes given for the purchase price had become due and unpaid.

The considerations of the bond here in question were: If the grantee “shall . . pay the said several sums of money at the times specified, then the [grantor] . . is bound to . . execute to the [grantee]» . . a good and sufficient title; . . but on failure of the [grantee] . . to pay the said sums of money, or either of them…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Gray & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. Stewart v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Dukes v. BaughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. King v. LipseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Eaton v. HarwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Watkins. v. Maddox Medical Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Roberts v. Verdi (In Re Verdi)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API