Eaton v. Harwood
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
The special grounds of the motion for new trial are but amplifications of the general'grounds, that the verdict is contrary to law and to the evidence. The testimony of the parties and of their witnesses did pot altogether harmonize, but the jury were authorized to find the facts to be in accordance with the foregoing statement. An analysis thereof, taken in connection with the pleadings, will show that the jury were warranted in finding that before Eaton secured his option, Garland had entered into a contract with Harwood for the sale and purchase of the property, that Harwood…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ellis v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Stewart v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- King v. LipseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cassville-White Associates, Ltd. v. Bartow Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Bolton v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Lively v. MundaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Jackson v. LS BROWN COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.